Which is the extent to which there is an element of artificiality in the way interviews are constructed. Because whoever conducts the interview – – edits out material, perhaps adds descriptions of the surroundings in which the interview takes place, the clothes you’re wearing or mannerisms. And that is why, I think, the interview always really belongs to the interviewer. Because the person conducting the interview is always responsible for the shape and style and presentation of the subject matter.
Obviously this stuff is told in an interview, where else?
Comments are closed.