The leather-clad figure behind the wheels of steel was DJ Double R, aka Rick Rubin, the hirsute co-founder of Def Jam, who later gave the world Slayer.
hirsute (adj) : having or covered with hair [syn: hairy] – source: Seven Years of Plenty, p. 155
The leather-clad figure behind the wheels of steel was DJ Double R, aka Rick Rubin, the hirsute co-founder of Def Jam, who later gave the world Slayer.
hirsute (adj) : having or covered with hair [syn: hairy] – source: Seven Years of Plenty, p. 155
My god! There’s a proper class for all things celluloid! Why didn’t anyone tell me about before? What sort of conspiracy is this? The orgastic joy of finding new books rapidly reached its apex as I realized I’d once again hoarded way too many books to actually a) fit into my bag or b) have time to read.
This finally brings me into my true subject today. Now in case you want to read a general, introductoryish book on modern Finnish cinema, you can choose (at least) between Levottomat sukupolvet and Lyhyttä ja pitkää. Here’s a friendly word of advice: don’t touch the second one. It’s a collection of mini-bios, written by various authors, so there’s no coherence, no style and almost no substance, either. The first one, on the other hand, is an enjoyable romp that’s been organized thematically rather than chronologically. It’s written by the editor-in-chief of Finland’s national filmography, which is the kind of merit that qualifies one for writing these sort of books. I recommend the book highly, but others have had differing views.
In completely unrelated news, here’s my contribution to the old tech beats new tech discussion: I used our old-school timeshifter to record a telly program on Asterix. The show was broadcast on FST, was made by Germans and the interviewees all spoke French. Unfortunately there was no subtitling because of the binary wonders of DVB-C and Yle, so the program was a no-go.
The gist of the article is perhaps best summed up in this excerpt:
Those already bored with the phenomenon – particularly the techies who started blogging years ago as a way of sharing boring stuff about computer code – claim that the golden days of blogging are over, that what passes for blogging nowadays is the most banal wash-up of aimless lives, millions of pages slowing the internet and clogging Google. What they really don’t like is that publishing on the internet is not just for geeks any more.
Sound familiar, hmm?
Then she paused for a moment before asking with a smile on her face what on Earth it was that I was always ordering.
Obviously it’s taken her some time to build up the courage to ask.
I’ve received genuine emails of support as well. Their value is immeasurable, as nobody but nobody wants only to write and not read. No matter what they say. Everybody wants to be read.
But what I really was going write about was why this measly piece of everyday student newspaper journalism killed me dead in my tracks. So why did I react so strongly? I mean I’ve fucked up before and I’ve been told so, too. Why did this measly incident escalate into such a crisis? The reason is three-fold.
First of all what happened was that I took the whole thing very personally. Professionals are supposed to be able to separate their personal lives from their professional ones. I obviosly am not a professional. Someone critizing my writing is implicitly also dissing me as a person, as the story isn’t just reporting facts. Interviews usually aren’t. Sometimes the writer tells his opinion between the lines, sometimes he does it openly. As did I. And boy, did that one crash.
Second there was the fact that I had no one to fall back on. No editor I could blame for the subject matter, for choosing the interviewee, for imposing this expectations on me. I was all alone out there. This is, obviously, a two-edged sword for the writer. All the glory that comes from a good story is going to land on his shoulders and his shoulders alone…*; but that didn’t happen, not this time.
The third bit is even trickier. See, I don’t consider myself a real journalist. This isn’t a value judgement but a monetary one. My revenues are generated first and foremost from studying, so even though I do a bit of writing and not that much studying, my primary reference group is still university students. Therein also lays the problem.
You see, I thought I had a routine. I thought I had some skill. I thought that I was a competent journalist, even though if I wasn’t a great one. I thought I’d handled the interview and the writing okay and that things were in order. The subject’s comments pointed out quite clearly that they weren’t. I felt like a hack. I felt like all my training and work experience had done me no good. It was like my whole career as a journalist was suddenly annulled.
But here I am again, writing and trying hard not to look too self-indulgent. Well okay, I’m a tad self-centered. I mean come on, I’m writing this in my blog. Why?
Because it helps.
*: Strictly speaking this isn’t true, because the general public still seems to have difficulties in recognizing that news are made by individuals, not by the media illuminati. You dimwitted individual in the back: most pieces of copy include a byline that has the authors name on it. Yes, that there. It means the story wasn’t written by the paper itself but by a person, just like you and me. Yes, an individual.
Moreover, I’m a mediocre writer in my native tongue and even worse in English. That just means I need more practise.
And oh, to the person who’ll sooner or later turn up wondering miksi tämä härmäläinen kirjoittaa vieralla äpäräkielellä
: shut up and piss off.
Actually I feel a little better already. A Heartbreaking Blog of Staggering Genius, indeed.